Backward Induction or Forward Reasoning? - an Experiment of stochastic Alternating offer bargaining
نویسندگان
چکیده
Bounded rationality questions backward induction, which however, does not exclude such reasoning when anticipation is easy. In our stochastic (alternating offer) bargaining experiment, there is a certain first-period pie and a known finite deadline. What is uncertain (except for the final period) is whether there is a further period. Whereas backward induction requires information about all later pie sizes and probabilities, forward reasoning is expected to consider only the immediate prospects. Rather than relying only on decision data, we try to assess the cognitive approach such as forward reasoning of backward induction by control of information retrieval. We find that participants who begin with the shortest games before playing possibly longer games, initially resort to backward induction before switching to forward-looking behavior.
منابع مشابه
Cognition and Framing in Sequential Bargaining for Gains and Losses
Noncooperative game-theoretic models of sequential bargaining give an underpinning to cooperative solution concepts derived from axioms, and have proved useful in applications (see Osborne and Rubinstein 1990). But experimental studies of sequential bargaining with discounting have generally found systematic deviations between the offers people make and perfect equilibrium offers derived from b...
متن کاملReputational bargaining and deadlines
How will agents behave when bargaining in the face of an upcoming deadline? If irrational types exist, committed to their bargaining positions, rational agents will imitate this tough behavior to gain reputational benefits, even though this may result in the deadline being missed. Notably, if agents are patient and irrational types are committed to fixed demands then agreement must necessarily ...
متن کاملAlternating-Offers Bargaining Under One-Sided Uncertainty on Deadlines
Alternating-offers is the most prominent negotiation protocol for automatic bilateral bargaining. Nevertheless, in most settings it is still not known how two fully rational agents should behave in the protocol. In this paper we study the finite-horizon alternatingoffers protocol under one-sided uncertain deadlines. We make a novel use of backward induction in studying bargaining with uncertain...
متن کاملBargaining in Bundle over Multiple Issues in Finite-Horizon Alternating-Offers Protocol
This paper provides an algorithm to compute the subgame perfect equilibrium strategies in perfect information finitehorizon alternating-offers bargaining in-bundle over multiple issues. We show that the agreement is achieved immediately and is Pareto efficient. We make a novel use of backward induction for multiple issues and we prove that, for linear multi-attribute utility functions, the prob...
متن کاملBackward Induction versus Forward Induction Reasoning
In this paper we want to shed some light on what we mean by backward induction and forward induction reasoning in dynamic games. To that purpose, we take the concepts of common belief in future rationality (Perea, 2010) and extensive form rationalizability (Pearce, 1984; Battigalli, 1997; Battigalli, Siniscalchi, 2002) as possible representatives for backward induction and forward induction rea...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
- IGTR
دوره 16 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2014